Mayflower District Court
#formula1chronograph-v-mersea-police-department
This is the start of #formula1chronograph-v-mersea-police-department channel.
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-03 01:47 a.m.
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:07 p.m.
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-03 01:47 a.m. Permissions have been synced to
Channel Permissions Synced
Chambers of Magistrate RobertSabbatini
profile used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-03 01:47 a.m. @profile has added @mantisshrimp69 to the case channel.
Case Modified
profile 2025-12-03 01:47 a.m.
Presiding Honourable Magistrate Judge @robert
robert used /summon
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-03 02:07 a.m.:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @meowiitten (edited)
robert used /summon
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-03 02:08 a.m.:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @actxrz (edited)
robert used /summon
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-03 02:08 a.m.:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @adlithestevenson (edited)
robert 2025-12-03 02:11 a.m.
The Court, having received the Plaintiff's Civil Complaint, hereby ORDERS as follows: the Complaint is ACCEPTED FOR FILING. , SUMMONS shall issue forthwith to the Department of Justice, to appear on behalf of Defendant Mersea Police Department, pursuant to Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 7(a) and Mayf. Const. art. VI. Defendant shall file an ANSWER or other responsive pleading within seven (7) days of service, pursuant to Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 13(a)(1)(b). A PRETRIAL PERIOD of ten (10) days is hereby ordered, commencing upon service of summons, pursuant to Mayfl. D. Ct. Rule 3(1).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert Sabbatini
Magistrate Judge
Mayflower District Court(edited)
/s/ Robert Sabbatini
Magistrate Judge
Mayflower District Court(edited)
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:37 a.m.@robert can I orally request reconsideration as to the deadline for the answer to be filed? This is a FOIA matter, not a regular one; by statute it must proceed much more expeditiously than a normal lawsuit. See whatsmynamehuuu v. Mayf. Parks and Wild’l Dep’t; see also 4 M.S.C. 5 § 5313 (denoting that petitions for FOIA release such as this one must be completed “within 24 hours”).
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:38 a.m.
Definitely not 7 days. This entire case should be finished in like 1, 2 or 3 days at the most
judicialFLOW Bot2025-12-03 07:03 a.m.Requester: @actxrz
Party:state
Channel:formula1chronograph-v-mersea-police-department
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. 
Request ID: 518f5325a2eb48b795d6df3680d9c4bc Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 07:13 a.m.
To clarify, the 24-hour window is not set in stone, cases grounded in FOIA (especially complex ones) can take longer than that; but it’s within the Court’s purview to aim for the case to be finished within or around 24 hours.
judicialFLOW Bot2025-12-03 09:41 a.m.@actxrz appears for state (approved by @robert ).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:07 p.m.
robert 2025-12-03 09:41 a.m.
Ok 24 hours is just unreasonable tho
robert 2025-12-03 09:41 a.m.
I’ll give (4) days @mantisshrimp69
robert 2025-12-03 10:42 a.m.
4 days @actxrz
robertOk 24 hours is just unreasonable tho
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 01:47 p.m.
it's not unreasonable at all your honor
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 01:47 p.m.
I'll reiterate that these types of petitions are meant to be completed in their entirety within 2 to 3 days at the most by statute, and earlier courts have affirmed that
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 01:48 p.m.
to give 4 days just for an answer to be filed, the very very first deadline of several, already is way over those 2 to 3 days
robert 2025-12-03 05:02 p.m.
People have a life, and it’s unreasonable to think someone can file a notice of appearance, communicate with the court about responding and then respond within 24 hours
robert 2025-12-03 05:02 p.m.
The files you are requesting, are they important? @mantisshrimp69
robertThe files you are requesting, are they important? @mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 05:03 p.m.
that's not really relevant
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 05:03 p.m.
but yes
robertPeople have a life, and it’s unreasonable to think someone can file a notice of appearance, communicate with the court about responding and then respond within 24 hours
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 05:03 p.m.
Im not saying they should do it within 24 hours
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 05:03 p.m.
Im saying 4 days is too much
robert 2025-12-03 05:04 p.m.
ok so how long
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 05:04 p.m.
2 days
robert 2025-12-03 05:04 p.m.@actxrz Hello Respond
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:17 p.m.
dude
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:17 p.m.
you’re the judge
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:18 p.m.
stop being pushed around by the petitioners attorney
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:18 p.m.
we are given 7 days to respond per the rules
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:21 p.m.@robert statute says they dont get 7 days
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:21 p.m.
you're not being pushed around by an attorney, you're being pushed around by the law
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:21 p.m.
statute don’t say nthn
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:21 p.m.
actually it does
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:22 p.m.
send full screenshot
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:22 p.m.
ok
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:22 p.m.
of the entire foia act
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:22 p.m. 
actxrzof the entire foia act
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:22 p.m.
you can look it up yourself
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:22 p.m.
god bless
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:22 p.m.
go ahead and send the picture
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:22 p.m.
like a good shit
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:22 p.m.
slut
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:23 p.m.
auto correct
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:23 p.m.
attorney*
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:23 p.m.@robert statute requires that courts aim to end a case arising from a foia petition within 24 hours
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:23 p.m.
a few days at the latest
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:23 p.m.
you can read whatsmynamehuuu for this, or the statute itself, like I said
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:23 p.m.@robert well respond in 4 days.
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:23 p.m.
max.
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:24 p.m.
you can't just do whatever you want mr actxrz
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:24 p.m.
you need to abide by the law you do realize that
robert4 days @actxrz
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:24 p.m.
^
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:25 p.m.@robert are you making it 2 days then
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:25 p.m.
4 days is just fine little buddy
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:25 p.m.
you’ll live
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:25 p.m.
trust me
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:26 p.m.
4 days without a clark county court case seems like a lot for u, i know… but it’ll be ok
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:26 p.m.
deep breaths
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:29 p.m.
i haven’t even had time to review the petition
robert 2025-12-03 06:29 p.m.
hi
robert 2025-12-03 06:29 p.m.
why are we both talking
robert 2025-12-03 06:29 p.m.
rn
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:29 p.m.
am i allowed do that, your honor @mantisshrimp69 ?
robert 2025-12-03 06:29 p.m.
stop
robert 2025-12-03 06:29 p.m.
let me read this
actxrz 2025-12-03 06:29 p.m.
can i review the petition?
actxrzslut
robert 2025-12-03 06:30 p.m.
You apologise to the other counsel for this remark
robert 2025-12-03 06:30 p.m.
i don’t care if you corrected it afterwards
actxrzstop being pushed around by the petitioners attorney
robert 2025-12-03 06:31 p.m.
I’m not being pushed around at all, I think it’s reasonable to allow 4 days considering everything
robert 2025-12-03 06:31 p.m.
7 days for a FOIA response is again, unreasonable
mantisshrimp69robert 2025-12-03 06:31 p.m.
4 days stands
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 06:32 p.m.
Roger roger
robert 2025-12-03 06:32 p.m.
thank you counsellor
robert 2025-12-03 06:32 p.m.
(s)
robertYou apologise to the other counsel for this remark
actxrz 2025-12-03 07:38 p.m.@mantisshrimp69 Sowwy 
actxrz 2025-12-03 07:39 p.m.
for... Calling u a good slut
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-03 07:40 p.m.
i accept your apolocheese
actxrz 2025-12-03 07:41 p.m.
Ty npz 
judicialFLOW Bot2025-12-03 07:53 p.m.Requester: @mantisshrimp69
Party:plaintiff
Channel:formula1chronograph-v-mersea-police-department
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. Request ID: f3d31ea5858b455db7e1a1e4eca9bf83 Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
actxrz 2025-12-03 08:03 p.m.@robert state will not contest to the petition
judicialFLOW Bot2025-12-03 09:12 p.m.@mantisshrimp69 appears for plaintiff (approved by @robert ).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:07 p.m.
actxrzrobert 2025-12-04 08:51 a.m.
so noted
robert 2025-12-04 08:52 a.m.
order soon
UserMessage could not be loaded.
robert 2025-12-05 12:54 a.m.
robert 2025-12-05 12:54 a.m.@mantisshrimp69 who runs MPD
robert 2025-12-05 12:54 a.m.
like the chief
robert 2025-12-05 12:54 a.m.
or whatever we call it
robert used /timer
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-05 12:54 a.m. Sunday, December 7, 2025 at 12:54 a.m. (2 months ago )
Timer
robert 2025-12-05 12:55 a.m.
i've just been notified tacticalblue runs it
robert used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-05 12:55 a.m. @robert has added @redneck to the case channel.
Case Modified
robert 2025-12-05 12:55 a.m.@redneck ^
robert 2025-12-05 12:55 a.m.
Please notify me once you have done so.
robert used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-05 12:56 a.m. @robert has added @AdamC_2001 to the case channel.
Case Modified
robert 2025-12-05 12:56 a.m.@AdamC_2001 hello what do you do for MPD
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 12:57 a.m.
I’m captain of field support
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 12:57 a.m.
we usually handle background check
robert 2025-12-05 12:57 a.m. 
robert 2025-12-05 12:57 a.m.
Okay, fantastic
robert 2025-12-05 12:57 a.m.
thank you for acting upon this so quickly, I appreciate it
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 12:57 a.m.
okay
robert 2025-12-05 12:58 a.m.@mantisshrimp69 advise me once this has been completed
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 12:58 a.m.
Can I just
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 12:59 a.m.
Send it here
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 12:59 a.m.@robert
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 12:59 a.m.
make my life easier
robert 2025-12-05 12:59 a.m.
Sure
robert 2025-12-05 12:59 a.m.
Wait
robert 2025-12-05 12:59 a.m.
No
robert 2025-12-05 12:59 a.m.
I don't want his personal records being disclosed to the public
robert 2025-12-05 12:59 a.m.
You can do so in direct messages, please
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:00 a.m.
for you
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:00 a.m.
or
robert 2025-12-05 01:01 a.m.
No to the requester of the records
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:01 a.m.
Ok so after that we solid or what
AdamC_2001Ok so after that we solid or what
robert 2025-12-05 01:03 a.m.
once the petitioners counsel confirms this was sent, yes
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:03 a.m.
and no further action will be taken against mpd yes?
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:15 a.m.@robert
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:15 a.m.
yea?
AdamC_2001and no further action will be taken against mpd yes?
robert 2025-12-05 01:16 a.m.
well correct
robert 2025-12-05 01:17 a.m.
if you comply with my court order there won't be any other action
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:20 a.m.
Ok cool
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:20 a.m.
so send for formula
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:20 a.m.
to
robert 2025-12-05 01:21 a.m.
correct
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:25 a.m.
Ok I sent
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:27 a.m.@robert now that I sent we good?
robert 2025-12-05 01:29 a.m.
i am waiting for plaintiff's counsel to confirm
robert 2025-12-05 01:29 a.m.
sorry petitioners
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:30 a.m.@mantisshrimp69
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:30 a.m.
hurry
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 01:30 a.m.
up please 
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:12 a.m.@robert I was sleeping sorry
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:27 a.m.
The respondent sent the records to my client’s DMs
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:27 a.m.
But in my eyes they’re insufficient
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:29 a.m.
The message histories they sent us are inconsistent with each other as if they cropped some things out
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:29 a.m.
I’d like it if we could seal this channel (seeing as there are private records at play) to explain why I think that
mantisshrimp69I’d like it if we could seal this channel (seeing as there are private records at play) to explain why I think that
robert 2025-12-05 09:43 a.m.
The Court grants Plaintiff’s request to seal this channel for purposes of reviewing the suitability of the records produced.
robert 2025-12-05 09:43 a.m.@Prothonotary's Office please seal and advise once done
robertprofile 2025-12-05 09:47 a.m.
Completed
robert 2025-12-05 09:48 a.m.
Plaintiff’s counsel may proceed to explain the alleged deficiencies. The State may respond.
-#@mantisshrimp69 @AdamC_2001 @actxrz
-#
mantisshrimp69 Server2025-12-05 09:48 a.m.
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:48 a.m.
This is what he was sent
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:49 a.m. 
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:50 a.m.
The yellow message where it’s highlighted because of a ping is asking the “Street Intelligence Unit” what they can “get” my client for to deny him entry into the department
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:50 a.m.
Further down the different members discuss this
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:51 a.m.
save ur breath
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:51 a.m.
However between the two messages that are not yellow/highlighted, you can see there’s no continuity or any sort of evidence that those messages were said right after each other
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:51 a.m.
This invites an inquiry—maybe in between those messages there’s something they’re not showing us
AdamC_2001save ur breath
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 09:52 a.m.
If you can just show us a screenshot to debunk what I’m saying we can gladly close the channel rn
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:52 a.m.
my god bro
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:52 a.m.
i was on my phone on 2 am
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:52 a.m.
while i was WORKING IRL
robert 2025-12-05 09:55 a.m.
You had 48 hours, nobody told you to do it the second I did that order @AdamC_2001
robert 2025-12-05 09:55 a.m.
The Court has reviewed the records submitted. Plaintiff’s counsel raises a concern regarding the completeness of the production
robertYou had 48 hours, nobody told you to do it the second I did that order @AdamC_2001
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:56 a.m.
well i wanted it to be over with
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:56 a.m.
my boss was yelling at me
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:56 a.m.
since im legal counsel
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:56 a.m.
it fell on my lap
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:56 a.m.
its all the same chats
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:56 a.m.
lemme get better pic
robert 2025-12-05 09:56 a.m.
So therefore, The State is ORDERED to confirm, within 24 hours shether the records produced represent the complete, unedited message history responsive to the FOIA request and if not, to produce the complete records immediately.
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:57 a.m.
yes its the complete thing
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:57 a.m.
what you think im gonna edit them?
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:57 a.m.
over this
robert 2025-12-05 09:57 a.m.
If the State represents that the production is complete, and Plaintiff still contests this, the Court will consider whether further relief is warranted
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:57 a.m.
nonsense
robert 2025-12-05 09:57 a.m.
Counsellor, lose the attitude
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:57 a.m.
i dont have one
robert 2025-12-05 09:57 a.m.
You’ve had it ever since I added you into this case channel
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:57 a.m.
im telling you im not no way editing anything
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:57 a.m.
No i haven't
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:58 a.m.
Im asking questions
robert 2025-12-05 09:58 a.m.
So why is Plaintiff lead to believe this is not the entire production ?
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 09:58 a.m.
i dont know
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 10:00 a.m.
I’m not saying you edited it I’m saying you intentionally didn’t screenshot certain parts
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 10:00 a.m.
But if you say that’s all of it I believe you
robert 2025-12-05 10:00 a.m.@AdamC_2001 has represented that the production is complete. @mantisshrimp69 , the Court directs you to explain specifically what evidence suggests the records are incomplete or edited and what specific records do you believe are missing?
robert 2025-12-05 10:01 a.m.
If you can demonstrate gaps or inconsistencies
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 10:01 a.m.
I think it might not be all of it because there’s no continuity between the chat messages meaning perhaps a few messages were missed in between
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 10:01 a.m.
But if defense counsel affirms that aint the case then its ok
robert 2025-12-05 10:01 a.m.
The the Court will consider appropriate relief
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 10:01 a.m. 
AdamC_2001 2025-12-05 10:01 a.m.
this is all
robert 2025-12-05 10:02 a.m.
I am satisfied with this.
AdamC_2001Click to see attachment.
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 10:02 a.m.
Ok so a few messages were missing then like I suggested
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 10:02 a.m.
I take it this was accidental so I thank you for the messages
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 10:02 a.m.
We can close this
robert 2025-12-05 10:02 a.m.@AdamC_2001 send a dm to npz with the updated photos
mantisshrimp69 2025-12-05 10:02 a.m.
I forwarded them
robert 2025-12-05 10:04 a.m.
The Petition for disclosure of records having been GRANTED , and the Defendant having produced the requested records, and the parties having resolved all outstanding disputes regarding the production,
It is herebyORDERED that this matter is CLOSED . (SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert Sabbatini Magistrate Judge, Mayflower District Court)
-# cc: Archive@Prothonotary's Office
It is hereby
-# cc: Archive
profile used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-05 10:04 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-05 10:04 a.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1446517709155205322 Successfully created transcript.
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-05 10:05 a.m. Permissions have been synced to
Channel Permissions Synced
Volume XIVExported 199 messages